It isn't avarice, greed, or laziness, it is an illness so he ends up in dreck like this. They had a lot of problems with his scenes in "Motherless Brooklyn." Even as far back a 2015 he could be seen with an earpiece to feed him linesĮssentially this once great actor, with not just action chops, but such expressive portrayal of irony and humor, as well as excellent work in dramatic roles s has a major health issue. That is why if you notice in a film such as this he has one short line per scene cut. In contrast, Willis is long rumored, since 2015 to have serious early onslaught failing memory. It isn't like Billy Zane, Val Kilmer or Michael Madsen who are just cashing in in endless low budget dreck. up some other movies, so here's a new one." To paraphrase my summary line from the movie, I'll just say, '.they f. And how about that composite monster that came together from all the blasted human and alien body parts? That was the dumbest looking creature I think I've seen since that Horta on the old Star Trek series from the Sixties the episode was called 'The Devil in the Dark' in case you're interested. Did you ever wonder how a toxic substance like Moxacell can destroy anything it touches except the container it's in? That one kills me every time. The concept here was derivative of other sci-fi offerings, most notably the Alien franchise. I don't know what possesses him to make flicks like this, maybe it's like your favorite band that just has to keep on playing because they love to create music. My advice, if you have to watch it at least make sure it's free.įor Bruce Willis fans this is only slightly better than a handful of his more recent films like "First Kill", "Acts of Violence" and "Trauma Center". Plus we're going to make moonshine and party it up in our filthy ship that we make 'six' janitors (really just one) clean with our two toilets for all the crew and 300,000 passengers ( I mean really, they didn't think anyone had to go before being cryofroze?)Īnd the monster at the end? Whaaaaa? Was it a paper mache critter that the actors' kids made during quarantine? Really bad, but at least it was really cheap to rent. And on the way we're going to smoke cigars, cigarettes, weed inside our last ship. The main idea being humans messed up the earth, let's go to New Earth. I mean I love a good Alien rip off storyline but I think the actors just improv'd their way throughout. Nope, just the actor breathing while lying there. At one point a 'corpse' swallows and I thought it was supposed to be coming back alive. This movie was so bad it had to be a joke right? From the sets, to the acting to the 'special' effects this was sooooo bad. Honestly, Leprechaun 4: In Space was more entertaining and better and it was made in 1996. There are a few chuckles but other than that there are hardly any redeeming points to this. Actors like Bruce Willis, Rachel Nichols, Collin Mullvey and Thomas Jane among others have little to do and have terrible dialogue and story to contend with. The movie basically borrows ideas from The Thing, Alien, Pandorum and many other superior films and copies some elements poorly. The movie is badly filmed with terrible sound and poor visual effects which are similar to what bad sci-fi movies had in the late 1980s or early 1990s. Soon the crew members start dying and killing eachother and the survivors end up battling an alien life form that overtakes and imitates its host and is trying to kill them all. 180 days from their destination a skeleton crew is running the ship while the passengers are in hyper sleep. In the 2240s a space ship leaves a plague infested earth carrying the future inhabitants of new earth. Anti-Life is mostly a complete waste of time, space and film.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |